0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¾ÏȯÀÚ ¿Ü»ó ÈÄ ¼ºÀåÀ» À§ÇÑ ÁßÀ翬±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ÞŸºÐ¼®

A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Research for Posttraumatic Growth in Cancer Patients

Á¾¾ç°£È£¿¬±¸ 2016³â 16±Ç 1È£ p.9 ~ 19
KMID : 1035120160160010009
¹Ú¹ÌÇâ:Park Mi-Hyang
¹ÚÁ¤¼÷:Park Jeong-Sook

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to analyze effect size of the intervention studies for posttraumatic growth in patients with cancer.

Methods: A total of 871 studies published between 2000 and 2014 were identified by searching Ovid-Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, PsycARTICLES, Cochrane library, RISS, and KISS. 15 studies were selected for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) Ver. 3 program and the effect sizes were shown using Hedges's g score.

Results: Intervention studies included 5 studies on Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM), 4 studies for Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), 2 studies for couple-based intervention, and 1 study each for health coaching, building resilience, yoga and painting intervention. The overall controlled effect size was 0.335 (95% CI=0.231, 0.438), using a fixed effects model. The most effective intervention was the couple-based intervention (0.368, 95% CI=-0.146, 0.883), followed by MBSR (0.340, 95% CI=0.172, 0.508) and CBSM (0.314, 95% CI=0.139, 0.490).

Conclusion: Cancer is one of the most significant traumatic events that affect patients' lives, a few cancer patients have been known to have posttraumatic growth. Therefore it is necessary to consider nursing interventions to increase posttraumatic growth for cancer patients such as couple-based intervention, MBSR and CBSM.
KeyWords
¾ÏȯÀÚ, ¿Ü»ó ÈÄ ¼ºÀå, ¸ÞŸºÐ¼®, ÁßÀç ¿¬±¸
Neoplasms, Growth, Meta-Analysis, Clinical Trial
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed